Wednesday, May 04, 2016

TableTop Day

Last Saturday was Geek & Sundry's International TableTop Day!

Did you know that?  Based on the communities I'm a member of in a bunch of places, you probably didn't. I knew. My FLGS owner knew. The Wednesday games crowd knew (even if most of them just learned on Wednesday).

I don't know why word didn't spread as well this year. We only had about a dozen folks turn up. It was up from last year, but waaaay down from two years ago.

I arrived late, but I still had a great time.

We played Room 25 and Mascarade and Hyperborea (although we got a ton of rules wrong on that last one).  I really enjoy all three games.

Hyperborea was a bit of a stark reminder to me that I need to review rulebooks regularly so I'm better-able to teach and/or play them, because we got so many rules incorrect. But it was still fun, and we may play again tonight.

I walked out with a handful of promos for games I own.

I hope your local TableTop Day went well and you had a good time.

Wednesday, April 27, 2016

Events From This Last Weekend

I know last week I posted a list of what I was working on - and I'm still working on it. But I wanted to talk a bit about this last weekend, and push back scheduled posts in the process.

Because last weekend was one of the best weekends of gaming I have had in a very long time. And it was only two games.

We started by kicking off a Risk Legacy campaign with the full five players. Stultz, Jim, Wade, Steph, and myself.  I dealt the starting power cards randomly, and so each player gave each faction a single power. I dealt out resource cards randomly, and each player then applied coins to location cards.

That way, everyone was invested in the game from the beginning.  It was fascinating, because everyone flinched when they tore up the unselected faction power. And when the first scars were applied to the board, people (again) flinched a bit - even when other players were the ones doing the scarring.

Then Wade upped the ante - the winner of the game could add +1 to one of their Icon Relationship rolls that night. He's the GM, he can do that.

The game was ... fun. And refreshing in a way that Risk rarely is. And it was over in an hour and change. And Wade won.

We'll be getting together before every 13th Age session in order to play.

We followed that up with our 13th Age game.  We picked up in media res - we just finished some combat last week, and we continued with more this session.  Our characters were out of or low on daily abilities, and some of us were low on hit points.

We had one small skirmish encounter against some zero-level foes (which we mowed through like wheat), and discovered a hellhole opening under the town.  We're not well-equipped to handle hellholes. But there were other foes about, too.

One of our recurring nuisances is a character named Thurash Many-Rocks, Smasher of Elves. I don't think those stats are current, because we've been dealing with him since we were second or third level.  We're fifth level, now. And we finally had our throwdown with him (and a couple of his mooks). We dealt with the mooks pretty quickly, but Thurash himself was a bit more of a challenge.

Our Ranger eventually dealt with him.

And then demons possessed the corpses of the fallen Orcs, and we were in Big Trouble. There were four of us and four of them, and they hit as hard as (or harder than) we did and had more hit points than most of us.  How many did they have? Enough that our Wizard's "Sleep" spell couldn't take any of them down.

We were - as mentioned earlier - depleted. Beaten. Worn down. Defeated. I was out of Command Points (which are a class thing for the Commander class, and which I used a couple of times to heal the party and let them re-roll attacks or damage).

"Wade," I said, "I'd like to spend one of my Icon Relationships."  Hochnor, you see, has a conflicted relationship with the Crusader.

Have I discussed Icon Relationships here, before? Let me explain:

Every character in 13th Age has a relationship of some sort with one or more of the big Movers & Shakers of the setting. Before each session, you roll 1d6 per relationship point. On a five, you can get a favor with a complication of some sort. On a six, you can call on that Icon for direct assistance with no complication. These favors aren't explicitly spelled out in the rulebook, so as a player, you need to figure out what to ask for, and then the GM needs to rule if the complication is severe enough or what.

"Wade," I said, "I rolled a five with the Crusader, and I'd like to spend that, now."

See, at this point we were fighting demons in a city that was being consumed by a direct portal to Hell.  That is a very good time to call in a favor or ask for help. The Crusader isn't someone I'd choose as an ally, but he hates demons. And he has armies at his beck and call.

"I'd like some allies for this fight. This is very much an 'enemy of my enemy' situation. And, for the complication, we can give him the city after this is over."

The rest of the party gaped at me a bit.

"What? It's not like we can do anything with the hellhole - and the Crusader loves turning hellholes into forts. Our options are pretty clear; Even if we beat these things, we can't do anything about the hellhole. The Crusader can. And giving up the entire city is a significant complication. We also know that there are some of his troops on the way. By spending this roll, I'm accelerating the aid in a way that may keep us alive."

Wade thought about it for a moment, and then a portal opened up and four of the Crusader's elites stepped through to assist us. They locked themselves in combat with two of the four demon-possessed orc corpses. That was half of our foes.

At this point, the party got a couple of hits in on one of the corpses. Not enough, but a bit. I was between them and the rest of the party.

Hochnor normally relies on his high AC to avoid getting hit. And it usually works. He plants himself between the rest of the party and the foes, soaks a few hits here and there, and everyone works together to take down whatever.

Unfortunately, he was down to 34 hit points and these foes dealt miss damage.

You see, in 13th Age, even when you miss with an attack, you will often still deal damage.  But usually that only applies to PCs. Enemies that deal miss damage are rare and exceedingly dangerous.

I took miss damage from one, and then the other one scored a hit with just enough damage to knock me down. This left the squishy party members with no wall in place.

We're a party without a cleric. I'm the primary party healer, via the "Rally now!" Command. So when I'm down, we're in trouble.  Especially when we're out of healing potions. Especially when the casters are out of their heavy artillery.

In 13th Age, Death Saves are made every round when you're down. On a 16+, you can recover, and then act naturally in the following round.  On a Nat20, you can get up and act right away. If you fail four times, you die.

We didn't have four rounds to spare. The orc corpses were dealing 20-ish points on a hit and six or seven on a miss, and most of the party doesn't have enough HP to take that amount of punishment for more than a round or two. And the party wasn't rolling great damage when they hit that night.

"Wade," I said on my turn. "I have this Six with the Emperor. Since our dying causes this city to fall and probably starts a domino effect in favor of the Diabolist, this is Very Much an Imperial Matter. So I'm cashing this in for my Death Save."

He gave me the effect of a Natural Twenty on that save, so I got to act immediately.

"I Smite Evil!"  It's a once-per-battle paladin ability. I get a +4 to hit and add 2d12 to my damage. It's not a small thing to use, and - realistically - I should probably start each battle with it.

I rolled a natural 20.  Wade didn't even make me roll damage - that killed the thing dead (even though realistically the maximum damage would have been 128 on a perfect roll and it hadn't even been touched, yet, because of how the rest of the party was rolling).

That roll turned the tide, and the party's rolls improved almost immediately. I wasn't able to get a solit hit in on the remaining thing, but it couldn't hit me, either.  The rest of the party dealt with it. The last foe down, we got out of town and called it for the night.

It was an epic session, and I was more engaged than I usually am.

Our next session is only two weeks out, and we get to start with game two of our Risk Legacy campaign.  I can't wait to see what is unlocked.

Wednesday, April 20, 2016


Last week, we played a game that I would not describe as good. It was fun, and we spent several hours playing it, but Superfight is - again - not a good game.

But it's fun.

Now, I've demoed this game at several conventions and walked away underimpressed. It's Apples to Apples with a little bit more.

Each player has a hand of four cards - two each from two different decks.  One deck has white backs - those are all characters.  One deck has black cards. Those are modifiers. Each turn, you will play one white card and one black card and then draw one additional black card off the top of the deck for a bit more randomness.

And then you argue over who would win in a fight to the death.

It's not great. And - the basic game - is not very fun.  But there are about six million expansions, each is color-coded. Want a bit more Cards Against Humanity in your game? Mix in the Red Deck. Want to play with kids? The Green Deck. Anime fan? Pink deck. But there are three decks that can change the game to fun.

The Blue Deck adds locations, the Yellow Deck adds different competitions, and the Purple Deck adds conditions to the scenario. Any of these alone could be fun. Or would be if they included rules.

The back of the Purple Deck box says (in all caps):
That's all the rules it has.

When I dug the game out, one of the players had played the game before. "I'm out," she said.

"Hang on," one guy told her, "Eric dug it out, so he probably understands the rules better and it's probably fun. Eric doesn't bring lame games." I'm paraphrasing, here, because I don't remember his exact words, but that's the gist of what he said.

We played in "Super-villain Mode" which means one player serves as judge - and sets out the villain for everyone else's hero to defeat. It means everyone is playing at all times and there's no table voting for a winner.  The Villain also got to draw from the variant decks. I didn't have Purple with me, so they drew two Blue and two Yellow cards each, chose one or two of them, and played those after the other players had selected their heroes.

It was ridiculously simple, but just that little bit of rules structure turned a box of random cards into something fun that people were willing to play.

It got me thinking a bit. No, a lot. About Good vs Fun vs Simple and how too many people conflate all of these. It's something I need to think on so I can write more about it later. Because Good and Fun are not the same.

It's not a good game. Even with the modifier decks, the rules as written are badly incomplete and in need of house rules to make it playable. But, with the barest shell of rules added, it became a fun game.

I wonder how many unfun games are only a rule or two away from being fun. I'll be thinking on that, too.

In a personal note, I'm now out of the March Crazies. An oddly-high number of my friends have March birthdays - and that includes my wife. Then, just past the end of March is my wedding anniversary. So that's time with family that needs to be spent. Both families, actually. And somewhere in there most years is Norwescon. So the end of March through the middle of April is usually ridiculously busy for me. But now things are settling back into their usual level of busy.

So here's a list of things I still need to post about, hopefully in the coming weeks, unless I get distracted or shipping is delayed or something:

  • Hero Forge
  • Good vs Fun vs Simple
  • Contests and Awards
I'm sure there are other things I'm going to be writing about, but those are posts I have partially-written that should be coming over the next few weeks.

Thursday, April 14, 2016

Cooperative Games

Lately, I've been playing a ton of cooperative games. And semi-cooperative games. And I'm learning a lot about them and the folks I play with in the process.

There are really two broad categories of games, here.

Cooperative games are games where all of the players are working together to defeat the game. Everyone wins or loses collectively.

Games in this first category include Ghost Stories and Pandemic and Forbidden Desert.

Semi-cooperative games are games where one of the players is a traitor. They are trying to pretend to be part of the team, but they are working against everyone else. Most players win or lose collectively in this style of game.

Games in the second category include Room 25 and Battlestar Galactica and Shadows Over Camelot.

I'm not putting together an exhaustive list of cooperative games, here, but here are a few that I own (and like) and my thoughts on them. I've talked about some of them before. Some of them are games I need to discuss more later. Before my summaries, though, I'm going to use two specific terms that could probably stand to be explained:

Replayability - How much fun the game is on multiple plays and how the game maintains this replayability.

Commander Effect - Many cooperative games suffer when one player decides to take charge of the game.  It makes it less fun for other players. Some games take steps to stop this through limiting information-sharing between players in some way. Some games have other limiters.

Pandemic - This game was, in many ways, the herald of the Age of the Cooperative Game. It maintains replayability through randomness, and is subject to the Commander Effect. Realistically, I prefer to play this via app these days. There are expansions available, but I don't own them.

Ghost Stories - Another of the early cooperative games. Replay through randomness, and subject to Commander. This is one of the most difficult cooperative games to beat for new layers. Some folks find it frustrating because of it. There's an IOS app for it, but nothing on Android yet. There are a couple of expansions for this game available.

Room 25 - Depending on the mode played, this is either fully-cooperative, team competition, or semi-cooperative. It maintains replayability through randomness. and there is currently one expansion out with a second due later this year.

Forbidden Desert - Another Matt Leacock design (he also did Pandemic).  The basic design itself is apparently older than Pandemic's, but it's also a very random game. I prefer Forbidden Desert to Forbidden Island, but both are solid. Even though the Commander Effect can be an issue.

The Grizzled - This is a relatively new game. Players take the role of soldiers during WWI. The goal is to deplete one deck of cards before the other deck is depleted.  It's replayability comes from randomness, but it avoids the Commander Effect by limiting what players can say. This is a game I need to say more about if I haven't already.

Witness - Witness is a Blake & Mortimer-licensed cooperative logic problem.  I love logic problems, but this game is tough. It's scenario-based, and each scenario is a puzzle. If you have a strong memory, each scenario has zero replay value. If your memory fades over time, like mine does, you can replay scenarios every few months. There are fifty or so scenarios in the game, so you're not likely to burn through it quickly. There is no Commander Effect here - each player works the puzzles and answers the same questions to gain a collective score. The game is a test of memory and communication.

TIME Stories - In many ways, this game is The New Hotness.  It's good. It's like one of those old LucasArts point-and-click adventure games in cooperative tabletop game form. There is possibility for the Commander Effect. And, similarly to Witness, there is almost no replay in the game unless your memory is not great.  I have a hunch that Asmodee's demo folks will be playing the heck out of this one.  There are several expansions, now, each of which is a new scenario.

Mysterium - I'm pretty sure I've talked about this one before.  It's Dixit crossed with Clue. One player is working to convey information to the other players.  The other players can bet on which answer they think is correct. Sometimes, one of those other players will be SO SURE that they have the correct answer that you'll see a bit of Commander, but not often.

Wednesday, April 06, 2016

The FLGS vs Internet Sales. Asmodee, Privateer Press, and Mayfair

I had a really long piece to say about internet sales vs FLGS sales following Asmodee North America's recent moves to protect the FLGS, and then W. Eric Martin went and made a long post of his own that made most of the same points I'd intended to make and made them better than I had, so I'm going to direct you there instead.

When I posted the  link to this on Plus, several people reshared and ran with it and I saw a lot of very interesting discussions with very good points on both sides.

Then Privateer Press took action of their own, and similar discussion popped up and spread.

And, of course, Black Diamond Games had their say, as well.

I'll probably have more to say about this at a later date, but start with those three posts.

Wednesday, March 30, 2016

Dungeon Twister on BoardGameArena

I haven't been able to play Dungeon Twister in a very long time, so I'm really very rusty, but, thanks to BoardGameArena, I can now play online.

Yes, the game is available on PS3, but that publisher has folded and so we will not be seeing expansions or bug fixes or anything of the like. And the number of players there was never significant and has already dwindled to almost nothing.

But now it's on BoardGameArena!

I've spent the last few days watching people play when it was slow, and I'm gratified to see that there are a ton of new players. But I've also spotted a number of familiar faces in the crowd - there are a ton of the best DT players on the planet actively playing the game on BGA right now. In fact, I've seen at least one former world champion wandering the maze.

This odd mix has led to some very lopsided games, and, I suspect, some discouraged rookies.

Rookies: Please do not grow frustrated at your losses. Please keep coming back for more. And not just because I'd like to have people around I can beat ...

Feel free to challenge me to turn-based games on BGA, by the way.  While I won't let you win, I'll probably be easier to beat than most experienced players because I'm always trying new things to see how well they work (or don't).

The following Wall of Text details the most common rookie mistakes I'm seeing on BGA (and a few tips):

Objects are not color-restricted. Blue characters can carry and use Yellow objects and vice-versa.

Characters can only carry one thing at a time. If you end an action in the same space as a thing, you are assumed to be carrying it (not sure if this part is implemented in BGA's interface, though).

If you are walking across an item as part of your movement and are not already carrying something, pick it up.  It may not be immediately useful, but if you're carrying it then your opponent can't pick it up and use it against you.

Wounded characters are treated as though they are objects (but they are color-restricted). You can carry your own Wounded.

Initial Setup
DO NOT PUT YOUR GOBLIN IN THE ROOM NEXT TO YOUR OPPONENT'S STARTING LINE. The player who reveals a room places the characters in that room. A Goblin in a room next to my starting line is going to be placed by me, and I'm going to put in him right in front of my Warrior.

While you can put your Troll on your starting line as one of your initial four characters, he's too slow for that to be effective or useful against experienced players.  It's not a bad idea to put your Troll in a room adjacent to your opponent's starting line.  It's very effective against rookies. It's still useful against more experienced players, but less-so.

Here is what the above two notes end up looking like:

I've turned the hidden pawns in that upper-left room face-up just for convenience.  It's Blue's turn, and they started the turn with three actions.

Action 1 was Reveal Room, which is where that Troll and the Treasure came from.

See that Troll placement?  The Troll is too slow to catch anyone, and moving the Troll to the Treasure will cost four actions. These are four wasted actions, by the way. because by the time the Troll gets there, more rooms will be revealed and it's entirely possible that Blue will have grabbed that treasure with another character.  There are almost certainly more efficient ways to spend those actions.

It's also worth noting that the Troll can also move himself back down to reveal a room, but - again - that's a ton of actions, most of which will be wasted.  In his current position, this Troll will never even see an enemy character. As soon as he moves forward, he escapes the maze and is worth a point for Yellow. He also stops being vulnerable to attacks.

For Blue's second action, they reveal that other room up there, giving this:

I've placed two Goblins in this room to highlight two different situations.

If Blue has done this as Action 2 of Three, then the Goblin goes where the Yellow goblin is on the image.  Then Blue spends their third (and final) action to use their Warrior to wound the Goblin. The Warrior has a Strength of three. The Goblin's Strength is one. Unless Blue does something really silly, that Goblin is Wounded and will be dead the following turn.

Had Blue only had two actions, the Goblin would have wound up where the Red Goblin is in the image. It keeps the Goblin from going anywhere (or doing anything) and sets Blue up for a future turn in which the Mechanork turns the room Clockwise and then the Warrior kills the Goblin.  The only real difference between the two situations is how long it takes Blue to deal with (and kill) that Goblin.

This situation, by the way, has come up for me a number of times when playing the game.

There are times when your opponent won't be able to effectively deal with your placement, but most of the rooms have somewhere you can place the characters to make them effectively useless. Or doom them.

This also isn't great initial placement by Blue. You rarely want to let your opponent completely take over one room like Blue did in that room with the Troll and the Treasure. You can sometimes get away with it adjacent to your starting line, but be cautious.  Chris Boelinger once beat me without ever activating one of his starting four characters or revealing those rooms.

Room Rotation 
Rotation isn't limited to the room you are currently occupying. The rooms are in pairs. So someone sitting on a grey rotation gear can turn either of the grey rooms (provided they've been revealed).

Each room has a specific direction it's capable of rotating (unless the Mechanork is the one doing the rotating). Each pair has one clockwise room and one counter-clockwise room.

Once used, Combat Cards do not come back (other than the zero).  This makes them different from the Action cards that come back once all of them have been used.

Jump Cards also don't come back after they've all been used.

The restriction on which Action Card can be played only applies to the first round. Once the cards cycle, you can play any of them.

Most experienced players will play a Combat Card that is just high enough to win the combat. Some players will "bluff" and play for the tie (that is play one short of the guaranteed win) in an attempt to burn their opponent's high-numbered Combat Cards.

Character Movement
Remember that picking up and dropping objects doesn't cost an action or part of your movement. It can be done in the middle of a movement action.

Remember that you can't move through unwounded enemies, but once they're wounded, they no longer block movement. You just can't stop on them.

If a wounded enemy is carrying something and you walk through that space, you can steal whatever item they're carrying.

Remember that you can move through friendly characters, you just can't stop on them (unless they're wounded).

The exception to a lot of movement rules is the Wizard, who is flying.  He can move through enemy characters and traps but can't stop on them.

The Wall-Walker can walk through walls, but it costs a full action to do so.

The Thief disables traps by sitting on them. Because of this, you can walk across traps that your Thief has disabled for you. If she becomes wounded while sitting on a trap, she will die immediately.

Jumping across a trap costs an action. Because of this, it can't be done as part of a movement. To jump on the BGA interface, move next to a trap, end your movement action, and then move to the space past the trap. It'll pop up a note informing you that it'll cost a jump card to do this.

General Notes
The Fireball Wand is, for experienced players, the key focus of the early game.  You want to get your Fireball Wand and deliver it to your Wizard.

If you attack with the Troll, be aware that a loss will make that Troll vulnerable to attack (and death) on your opponent's turn.

If your Cleric is wounded, he cannot heal himself or the rest of the team.  So if you're going to be doing a lot of combat, you need to protect your Cleric.

Hopefully this is useful and helpful and not just a Wall of Text.   Because - again - I want new players to keep playing, get better, and play more.

Wednesday, March 23, 2016

Sixty-One in Sixteen!

Last year in January, I saw a ton of people posting #51in15, as boardgamers rushed to play as many different games as they could.

And I get that - I do.

But it's thinking like that that has people playing Fluxx or Miskatonic School for Girls.

I know the drive to play is strong. And it's an important one for those of us who self-identify as gamers. But "play anything anyone sets in front of me to hit an arbitrary quota" is not the way to do it.

I would rather play a game that I like six times than six different mediocre games.

Last year, I played just over 70 unique games, and many of those games were ... okay.

Some of them were good games that I enjoy. Starfighter, for example.

Some of them were good games that I don't enjoy. Like Texas Zombies, which my wife (and her writer's group) loves.

Some of them were less-good games that I enjoy. I think Win, Lose, or Banana is the poster child for this one ... it's a terrible game, but it's an absolute blast and I can play it for hours at a time. The same goes for Epic Spell Wars of the Battle Wizards: Duel at Mt. Skullzfyre,

And some of them were just terrible games. Word Whimsy, for example.

My goal for the next year is simple:

Play more games I like than games I don't like.

If that means only playing twenty games this year, then I'll only play 20 games this year.

As I'm writing this, I've played twelve unique games so far, and they are all games that I want to play more of.

Yes, I'm going to play some new games this year. And some of them will almost certainly be duds. But I'm going to be working hard at breaking out more old favorites like Alhambra. Or getting actual play out of some of the games that have been on my shelf but haven't hit the table, yet. You know - in case they're undiscovered gems.